Federal Judge Rules in Favor of CFTC in Ongoing Case with Ooki DAO

US Federal Judge has ruled in favor of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over Ooki DAO suit

In a recent development, a federal judge has ruled in favor of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) after Ooki DAO failed to respond to an enforcement action initiated by the regulator.

🔥Reach more than 5 000 000 real investors via Twitter influencer marketing! 🔥

Notably, the ruling underscores the importance of compliance and engagement with regulatory authorities, highlighting the potential consequences for entities that disregard such actions.

Lawsuit Allegations

The CFTC filed a lawsuit accusing Ooki DAO of offering unregistered commodities and acting illegally as an unregistered Futures Commission Merchant (FCM). The CFTC claimed that Ooki DAO ran an unauthorized trading platform, infringing on commodities regulations and failing to comply with registration requirements.

Additionally, the original lawsuit filed against Ooki in September claimed Ooki failed to perform proper Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedures or any customer verification strategy in conjunction with the Bank Secrecy Acts compliance program.

Judge’s Ruling Against Ooki DAO

Accordingly, U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick supported the CFTC’s claims and granted a default judgment in its favor. The judge ruled that Ooki DAO had indeed operated an illegal trading platform and had acted as an unregistered FCM. 

Ooki DAO, however, failed to appear in court after repeated summons were delivered to them electronically. Accordingly, the court found Ooki civilly responsible for operating an illegal trading platform and illegally engaging as a futures commission merchant.

As a result, the Judge ordered the organization to pay a penalty of $643,542, permanently cease its operations, and shut down its website.

Although Ooki DAO did not formally respond to or acknowledge the lawsuit, it took the significant step of geofencing the US following the filing of the suit. Geofencing refers to restricting access to a particular geographic region, in this case, the United States. 

By implementing geofencing, Ooki DAO sought to limit its exposure to potential regulatory actions and legal consequences within U.S. jurisdiction.

Impact on DeFi and Regulatory Perceptions

The CFTC’s victory in the litigation against Ooki DAO by a federal judge sends a powerful message to the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) industry. It dispels the myth that DAOs are immune to regulatory scrutiny, confirming that regulations apply to the DeFi area. 

The judgment emphasizes the importance of compliance, registration, and interaction with regulatory agencies. As the DeFi industry continues to evolve, striking a balance between innovation and compliance will be crucial for its long-term success and legitimacy in the eyes of regulators and traditional financial institutions.

🔥Reach more than 5 000 000 real investors via Twitter influencer marketing! 🔥