Four stories carry money mechanisms before the US open, and only one of them has an actual date attached to it.
Four stories carry money mechanisms before the US open, and only one of them has an actual date attached to it.
Bitget will resume customer withdrawals in stages beginning September 28, following a security incident that halted the process, according to CoinGape and crypto.news. That date is the only scheduled mechanism in today's set: it converts an open-ended hack into a specific window when frozen customer funds either move or do not. One report puts losses at roughly $352 million in XRP and ETH, and the exchange's own confirmed details remain limited, which means the phased restart is also the first real test of how much of that figure Bitget can actually make good on.
Read against the freeze reported by BitKE and crypto.news, the mechanics look thinner than the headline number suggests. Circle and Tether have frozen more than $300,000 in stablecoins linked to the same hack, a fraction of the roughly $351.6 million reportedly taken, and Bitget is now offering a 5% bounty to anyone who helps freeze the remaining stolen funds. That bounty is itself a mechanism: it prices the recovery effort at roughly 5% of whatever gets clawed back, and it tells you the exchange expects issuers to do more of the freezing than it can do alone before Sunday's restart.
XRP-linked exchange-traded funds have drawn $38 million in inflows, according to AMBCrypto, which is a direct capital-flow mechanism sitting underneath questions about whether the token can clear the $1.60 level. Separately, Ripple's RLUSD stablecoin has reached a fresh supply high approaching $2.5 billion, with stablecoins circulating on the XRP Ledger collectively rising about 6%, cited across multiple reports. Neither number moves price by itself, but together they show two distinct mechanisms, ETF subscription and stablecoin minting, both adding dollars into the same ledger before the US session opens.
That distinction matters because inflows and mint growth are not interchangeable evidence. ETF inflows reflect demand for exposure to the token itself; a rising RLUSD supply reflects demand for dollar liquidity on the network, which can expand regardless of what XRP the asset does. Treating the two as one story overstates how much of that money is actually a bet on price.
Bitcoin came under fresh selling pressure after reports emerged that Trump rejected a proposed ceasefire deal with Iran, CoinGape and CryptoPotato reported, with a seven-day truce proposal reportedly on the table before it was turned down. That is a risk-off mechanism external to crypto: it moves money out of the asset through the same channel that moves it out of any risk asset when a geopolitical de-escalation fails to materialise. It carries no deadline and no flow figure, but it is the only item today that explains selling pressure rather than describing a transfer.
Hold onto the Bitget restart date. It is the one line item with an actual clock attached, and every other number here, the freeze, the inflows, the mint growth, only tells you where money is sitting, not when it moves.
Publisher counts are as at publication and keep moving; each story page carries the live number.
Hold onto the Bitget restart date. It is the one line item with an actual clock attached, and every other number here, the freeze, the inflows, the mint growth, only tells you where money is sitting, not when it moves.
Circle and Tether Freeze Over $300K From Bitget Hack Tied to $351.6M Theft
Bitget to Restart Withdrawals in Phases From Sep. 28 After Security Incident
Solana’s Alpenglow Upgrade, Targeting 150ms Finality, Reaches Second Testnet
XRP ETF Inflows Reach $38M as Traders Eye $1.60 Resistance
September 26, 2026
September 26, 2026
We measure how many people read this site. That is all it is used for — there is no ad network, no advertising cookie, and nothing sold to anyone. Decline and the site works exactly the same. What we collect