Developers behind the proposal say they will pursue the idea through a separate review process instead
The authors behind EIP-8363 have withdrawn their proposal to burn a portion of Ethereum staking rewards from the Hegotá upgrade. The move was reported by CryptoPotato and Unchained on October 2, 2026. Both outlets described the decision as a shift away from bundling the burn mechanism with the upcoming protocol changes.
EIP-8363 had proposed destroying some portion of rewards paid to validators who stake ETH to secure the network. Ethereum Improvement Proposals, or EIPs, are the formal mechanism by which developers suggest changes to the protocol. Each upgrade cycle typically includes a mix of proposals that are debated, tested, and either included or deferred by client teams and core developers.
Hegotá is the name given to Ethereum's next scheduled network upgrade. Upgrades like this one bundle together multiple EIPs that have passed through technical review and rough consensus among developers. Pulling a proposal from an upgrade does not kill it outright. It instead removes it from the current release timeline, leaving room for further discussion before any future inclusion.
According to Unchained's reporting, the authors intend to pursue the staking reward burn through a separate process going forward. This suggests the proposal may return in a later upgrade cycle, or follow a different review track altogether. CryptoPotato's account corroborates that the proposal has been removed from Hegotá's current scope.
Burn mechanisms are not new to Ethereum. The network already destroys a portion of transaction fees under EIP-1559, a change implemented in 2021 that altered the chain's fee market and reduced net ETH issuance during periods of high network activity. A staking reward burn would extend that logic to validator rewards, potentially reducing the net amount of new ETH entering circulation from staking.
Staking rewards are the payments validators receive for proposing and attesting to blocks on Ethereum's proof-of-stake chain. Any change to how those rewards are taxed or reduced through burning would directly affect validator economics. It could also influence the overall supply dynamics of ETH, a topic closely watched by investors tracking the asset's issuance and burn rates.
The decision to separate this proposal from Hegotá reflects a broader pattern in Ethereum's governance process. Contentious or economically significant changes are often decoupled from scheduled upgrades to allow more thorough debate. This reduces the risk of delaying an entire upgrade over a single contested proposal.
The withdrawal removes near-term uncertainty around validator reward economics tied to the Hegotá upgrade. Validators and staking service providers can plan around existing reward structures without accounting for an imminent burn mechanism.
For ETH holders tracking supply dynamics, the delay means any change to net issuance from staking rewards remains speculative rather than scheduled. Market participants watching Ethereum's monetary policy debates will likely continue monitoring the separate process the authors say they intend to pursue.
The proposal's removal from Hegotá does not end the discussion around burning staking rewards. It instead shifts the debate to a different timeline, with the outcome still to be determined through Ethereum's ongoing developer review process.
EIP-8363 is a proposal to burn, or permanently destroy, a portion of the rewards paid to Ethereum validators for staking ETH.
Hegotá is the name of Ethereum's next scheduled network upgrade, which bundles multiple approved protocol changes into a single release.
The authors chose to pursue the staking reward burn through a separate review process rather than include it in the current upgrade's timeline, according to reporting from CryptoPotato and Unchained.
No. Withdrawal from Hegotá removes it from the current upgrade cycle but leaves open the possibility it could be reconsidered later through the separate process the authors described.
Ethereum already burns a portion of transaction fees under EIP-1559. A staking reward burn would apply similar logic to validator rewards, potentially affecting net ETH issuance.
We measure how many people read this site. That is all it is used for — there is no ad network, no advertising cookie, and nothing sold to anyone. Decline and the site works exactly the same. What we collect